MacroQuest64

Wonder how long it will take for this to get banned, or how many flames I will get.


http://www.ziracle.com/MQ
get a compiled working version of MQ here

EDIT- Sorry, Im dsylexic. Fixed link its Z-I-R-A-C-L-E

Working with what feature set?
Does this have the custom UI changes?
Does this have my latest diff added?
Does this have the changes that will be added in 3 hours?

Binaries are out of date before you build them...

/g Inc Flame 1

You geek, The link is broken. Dumb ass.

/g Inc flame 2

Thanks for the hacked version, next time just ask me for my password.

heeh check it with a virus scanner, block it with a firewall.

Theres no virii or trojans in it

lol... like a virus scanner would know if you compiled MQ with some evil custom tweaks...

We've been trying to convince Zerix to take this down on this thread.

http://forever-hacking.net/forums/index ... c=675&st=0

I think convince isnt the right word. More like strongly debating :).

But Im not going to remove the link . Im also not going to start up another debate thread on the MQ boards.

Alls Im going to say is that I belive that people shouldnt not have access to MQ soley based on weather or not they can afford to purchase VS6

Zerix wrote:Alls Im going to say is that I belive that people shouldnt not have access to MQ soley based on weather or not they can afford to purchase VS6

Just a question.. But are you a dev? Would seem to me they are the ones to dictate how MQ should or shouldn't be distributed.

it can be distributed like this under the current licence (unless he doesn't include access to the source)

Zerix wrote:Alls Im going to say is that I belive that people shouldnt not have access to MQ soley based on weather or not they can afford to purchase VS6

Then give away VS6.

The number of your assumptions that are completely wrong is staggering.

shouldnt it be precompiled form? The reason for keeping this program precompiled is very clear.

1) Want to make people a bit more responsible using the program.
2) Limit the fly-by-night users who is not responsible.
3) Always respect the dev. They are the ones who makes it happen.

damn, now we got the link here too... soon he's going to post it on everquest.com's msg boards, crgaming's msg boards, and eqtrader's msg boards...

i agree, if you want to disrespect a dev, do it to microsoft, not to the ones who help you, but that won't fly, because people feel strongly against warez too in most cases, what i like is the warp command you added to the binary that anyone can use, then we'll see thousands of people warping around when a web crawler hits your site with the binary, that's really responsible to even add custom cmds to it before distribution, i mean, who won't love you for that...

/shrug.

zerix, you REALLY don't want to venture to this board with FH hacks implemented into a binary, can we get a vote to remove his link off of this board also - i think it's a damn shame that someone would do this.

Those that use third party distributed binaries deserve whatever they get in my opinion.

Perhaps I should start distributing a compiled version that randomly inserts shouts, ooc and tells to GMs. Suppose that would teach people to use their head?

oooooooo do that source, it sounds fun, i'd like to see it, i swear it'd be the best thing ever... but do it on patch days, and warn everyone in the mq community except zerix, and let him compile that one and distribute it... yea yea .. that's what i'll dream about tonight.

I think this is complete crap.....I posted at FH if anyone wants to know what I said.