few questions...

Elbownator · Post by **Elbownator** » Fri Mar 12, 2004 12:45 pm

hey i got a few questions concerning mq2

first off...i know its considered illegal to use, but

- can GMs know that you are using it if they are currently online?

- is there any way that you can keep them from noticing you if they ARE online?

and finally,

- if you do get caught, is it first time perma-ban, or warning, suspension, then ban?

Lax · Post by **Lax** » Fri Mar 12, 2004 1:20 pm

try the search feature, there are probably 2 thousand posts asking these very questions.

If you're not prepared to face the consequences, then don't use MQ2. It's as simple as that. It is detectable, but they don't automatically know who's using macroquest when they are online. It's a bit more complicated than that, which is why we developers have not been banned... That's about all we can give you as far as assurances.

Elbownator · Post by **Elbownator** » Fri Mar 12, 2004 2:51 pm

mind telling me what topics to search then? i would have but i dont know what i should have searched for

bob_the_builder · Post by **bob_the_builder** » Fri Mar 12, 2004 4:08 pm

"ban" and "idiot" come to mind as valid search terms.

Bob_the_intrepid

Amadeus · Post by **Amadeus** » Fri Mar 12, 2004 4:18 pm

Screw search. It is my opinion that anyone that wants to use the MQ2 product and participate in our project should read through *ALL* postings on this message board at least back 6 months.

If that seems like too much work or a hassle to anyone, they are free to leave because we have no time or patience for laziness.

Zak · Post by **Zak** » Sat Mar 13, 2004 5:09 pm

Yeah but don't be stupid like me and bump some thread from 4 months ago... rofl, seriously they will clown you.

Oid · Post by **Oid** » Sun Mar 14, 2004 10:00 am

Honestly, I think we are all probably just under sexed junkies addicted to EQ that will jump anything that moves. "My god you didn't search! someone brought up the patch message 4 seconds before you, bend over newb!" ........

Hmm... i am not condoning the non-use of search... dont hurt me.

bezerker · Post by **bezerker** » Mon Mar 15, 2004 9:34 am

Honestly, I think we are all probably just under sexed junkies addicted to EQ

Speak for yourself. I'm just an eq addict that can't stand the limitations eq puts on me!

Oid · Post by **Oid** » Mon Mar 15, 2004 12:13 pm

bezerker wrote:Speak for yourself. I'm just an eq addict that can't stand the limitations eq puts on me!

Errr.... k

Zak · Post by **Zak** » Mon Mar 15, 2004 2:14 pm

I have to say that I am in the under-sexed department, (I am married

) and definitely an EQ addict who will go fairly far to enhance the Everquest experience.

p00n · Post by **p00n** » Mon Mar 15, 2004 4:18 pm

Let me just say that if *any* of us, or any male in existance for that matter, claims to be "over-sexed", then there is something fundamentally askew with his sense of being.

"Over-sexed" is the Holy Grail. We got to seek that bitch forever, but we ain't no day soon going to find it.

few questions...

few questions...

uhh

Lol

lol